I'm not going to question the reasoning or appearance of several new Niche Anime boards over the past few weeks
I want to know; what prerequisites are needed to start an idea of my own
I have the idea and Wakaba part already; what's recommended for a host
I don't suppose my shared hosting account would last long for a project like this
Most of the boards are on shared hosts. How much bandwidth per month does your account provide?
Additionally, do they provide shell access and perl?
>>6 You don't even need shell access, just FTP.
Let me plug my referrer link to Dreamhost: http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?humblefool
>>5
My current host provides 5 GB of space and 50 GB of bandwidth, which I assume is not even close to sufficient for the purpose of an image board if threads are to live for more than seven days
I do have a working install of Wakaba that I put up while I was bored, however
I'd hazard a guess that most niche boards do not use more than 50GB a month. You're probably safe with one board, unless you strike lucky.
>>8 Actually, that should work for a smaller board. All the boards on iiichan.net only use ~4GB a day, so smaller, worksafe boards should be no trouble.
Here maybe? http://angel-tai.com/waka/wakaba.html
I'm of the opinion that series-specific boards are best avoided. Unless there's an enduring universe underlying it (see: Type-Moon or Gundam), the longevity is probably limited.
Galaxy Angel is a long running series. But there's already a dedicated board out there (though not on iichan) and the dedicated posters on iichan have dumped all their good stuff in the moe and cw boards. By now they're resorting to screencaps from GA games. There's clearly a demand for GA art but the well seems to be running dry.
>>13
It seems five new series boards have appeared just to spite you.
Oh, suggestion to whoever spawned /eva/ and /flcl/; why not just /gainax/?
>>16
yeah, I was thinking the same thing when I saw them.
>>16 that is a very good idea. Too late, though!
Okay then, I'll be starting the Nadia, Gunbuster, KareKano and Mahoromatic boards to fill the gaps.
>>19 gah! NULLPO.
I'll ask the boards if they mind merging.
Summary account RE >> 3983 in http://www.wakachan.org/elf/res/3983.html#i3983 parts in () are me interpreting for PE.
Dmpk2k is debating the following for PE (we are /elf/)
Cognac250: What sort of issues are there?
Dmpk2k: Allowing large files posted on a board causes large fluctuations in the board content. A single thread with a number of zips can empty a board of all image content.
( Remember, we have had no problems from posting zips. We’ve posted zips with out damaging our image content. In fact we have been models of proper manners regarding the economic use of zips.) On the other hand, if you increase the board size limit, and nobody posts archives, there will be too many images. It's one of the drawbacks of a size-limited board (as opposed to post-limited).
As for /file/, (see >> 3395 in http://www.wakachan.org/elf/res/3983.html#i3995 per Wolf’s comment) it's been tried before. It's potentially dangerous board because:
(What he means here is a board dedicated to just files, in our case this means zip or winrar. They’ve done this before and some posters were abusive.)
SO: ALL THIS MEANS: WE have basically 2 choices as dmpk2k will decide one or the other.
1should we choose the ability to upload larger file sizes.
-OR-
2. should we have an archive capability for PE?
Remember: we already have the ability to upload Zips- this is a blessing and we don’t want to loose it.
-or-3... are we just fine with our new capacity upgrade and don't want to bother with any new changes for now?
We should tell Dmpk2k what we think. Post your opinions and ideas in http://www.wakachan.org/elf/res/3983.html#i3983.
i know i had to say alot here, but lets try and keep it brief yet clear in PE, follow wolf's example in 3995 for clear brevity.
You. Stop trying to act like some kind of spokesperson for a board. Stop saying things like "We have basically 2 choices" about some idiotic issue you are trying to nag an admin about. And most of all, stop sock puppeting. I have half a mind to ban you forever, because not only is your inane drivel making the board nearly unreadable, but you are posting it as at least four different people.
And stop posting shit here that nobody but you cares about.
This is my first post here. I have been in ongoing discussions with Dmpk2k and blackmage via email. See http://iiichan.net/dis/discuss/index.html#1 51 - 60.
They know me as a proactive, long term poster concerned with representing my favorite board’s questions. If they have a question, I offer to ask Dmpk2k then reply in my board where they appreciate the information. By sock puppeting, I know what you mean. I am keeping like information together so it remains organized. I will no longer post in this particular discussion board- I should have introduced my self and my intentions first. For any incontinences I apologize. Thank you.
No, you don't know what I mean by sock puppeting. That means to post as several different people. Which you are doing all over /elf/. Cut that out, now. I let it slide the last time I had to ban you for acting like an idiot, but this time, you'd better shape up.
I should add: These are anonymous image boards. We don't care much for "proactive, long term posters". We don't need or want people to be "concerned with representing their favorite board’s questions". The board can represent itself just fine. It's shit like that that is making me consider suggesting shutting down the whole board, as you have managed to make it degenerate into pathetic little circle jerk.
my understanding of the definition must be wrong. I thank you for clearing it up in precise terms. i had gone away for a time then came back using "Action bastard" and "proxy cat" before settling back down to cognac250 where I will remain. yes, i acknowledge my mistake. Being in a state of mind as i was at the time is no excuse. I can clearly tell you are angry, and believe me when I say I am sorry for the trouble if that is worth any thing in my present state of credibility in your eyes. now, I am on my way to apologize to dmpk2k for any inconveniences this may have caused him. Thank you.
Yeah, except that when I checked the board months ago when you were making trouble, you were doing the exact same thing.
yes, this is true. for a long time i was not the model of good behavior and have swayed back and forth in such manner. simply put, you will find perhaps many marks on my record. this not the voice of excuse, but of open fact. i speak to dmpk2k not to condone- yes i am a bit upset too, so understand some venting may occur- but out of respect. i have iterated my past mistakes to others in command on various occasions. in those exchanges, i gained more insight into how a board works behind the scene as well. my posting behavior has toned down however inconsistently. as you say, i need to control that inconsistency. I spoke of this very issue to dmpk2k recently and he had many wise things to say. I speak so plainly because I am in earnest to be completely honest. I have been here a long time so on some points my memory may not be as precise as your logs. Again, despite how upset you are and I do want to covey any disrespect given my candid tone. Thanks again for your time.