[Art|ocs|oekaki] [A!MG] [Cats] [Cityscapes] [Comics] [FF] [Gainax] [Ghibli] [Haruhi] [Miko] [Music] [Nevada] [News] [Tabletop]
[iiichan] - [iichan|discuss|error] [4chan] [Overchan] [2chan]
[Burichan] [Futaba] [Gurochan] [Photon] - [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
Link
Subject
Comment
File
Password (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 51200 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • For the posting and discussion of world events and other strange things.

File: 1223461266887.jpg -(50953 B, 449x300) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
50953 No.8951  

Thousands of Troops Are Deployed on U.S. Streets Ready to Carry Out "Crowd Control"

By Naomi Wolf, AlterNet. Posted October 8, 2008.

Members of Congress were told they could face martial law if they didn't pass the bailout bill. This will not be the last time.

http://www.alternet.org/rights/101958/thousands_of_troops_are_deployed_on_u.s._streets_ready_to_carry_out_%22crowd_control%22/

(...)

U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman of California said to Congress, captured on C-Span and viewable on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaG9d_4zij8), that individual members of the House were threatened with martial law within a week if they did not pass the bailout bill:

The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and sustaining a panic atmosphere. … Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day and a couple of thousand on the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no.

If this is true and Rep. Sherman is not delusional, I ask you to consider that if they are willing to threaten martial law now, it is foolish to assume they will never use that threat again. It is also foolish to trust in an orderly election process to resolve this threat. And why deploy the First Brigade? One thing the deployment accomplishes is to put teeth into such a threat.

>> No.8952  

"the calm before the storm"

>> No.8959  

This is it.
New world order.
Those god damn conspiracy theorists put too many bad ideas in Dubya's head.

>> No.8960  

There's a difference between congressional martial law and regular martial law.

>> No.8961  

Like what? Less concentration camps?

>> No.8964  
File: 1223549196749.jpg -(31427 B, 690x280) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
31427

More on this:

Leahy Concerned about NorthCom’s New Army Unit

http://www.progressive.org/mag/wx100708.html

NSPD 51 defines a catastrophic emergency as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government function."

Notice the use of the word “or” above. In our current circumstances, it might be more relevant to read the definition this way: "any incident . . . that results in extraordinary levels of . . . disruption severely affecting the U.S. . . . economy."

President Bush could declare a catastrophic emergency today. And he’d have the 3rd Infantry, First Brigade Combat Team, well trained from its years patrolling Iraq, at his disposal here at home.



Delete Post []
Password