[A!MG] [Art] [Cats] [Cityscapes] [FF] [Gainax] [Ghibli] [Haruhi] [Miko] [Music] [Nevada] [News] [Oekaki] [Open Canvas] [Requests] [Tabletop]
[iiichan] - [iichan|discuss|error] [4chan] [Overchan] [2chan]
[Burichan] [Futaba] [Gurochan] [Photon] - [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
Link
Subject
Comment
File
Verification
Password (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 51200 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • For the posting and discussion of world events and other strange things.

Hey! Did you know that I'm dirt-poor? If you appreciate this website, feel free to send along some cash!


File: 1257281007645.gif -(12831 B, 200x216) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
12831 No.2642  

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/tories_vetting/

An incoming Conservative government would take steps to cut the vetting database down to size and would balk at 'pre-crime' behavioural vetting techniques.

Tory opposition to key elements of the Vetting and Barring process proposed by the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) emerged last night at a meeting of the Conservative Technology Forum, which met in the House of Commons to discuss issues around individual's ownership of their data.

The scheme has excited some controversy over the last few months, both for the likely extent of its coverage and because, according to leaked guidelines, it is the intention of the ISA not only to hold data on past criminal activity, but also to score individuals on the basis of their attitudes and beliefs.

Tory tech guru Liam Maxwell, who addressed the meeting, said that he was utterly opposed to the use of scoring in this way and that it was "just wrong". He added that while the Technology Forum was not a policy-making body, "we will be having words with Dominic".



Delete Post []
Password