I have alot of problems spotting my own errors can someone help me out...<3

>>6487
well what can I tell you? shit sux

ok srsly, the face is good, the neck is too long, the hands are shit, the hair is nice, I think the arms are too short, my dick's not standing, the picture is too big, the shading is sloppy, wtf is that in the lower left corner, no not her left. a glove maybe I dunno.. IS THIS A PERSOCON???
Who the fuck is S-SHIKINAMI? The guy who came in her eyes? Oh wait, those are tears. nm
Fuck wait it's a IJN destroyer rite? Sweet, is this sum WWII drama? The americans sunk that shit and she's all devastated isn't she? And her husband was the captain, I can see it now. I love your idea, that's soo cool! But those ears don't match the setting, you need to get real man

>>6489
YAY~ thanks Anon for the crit...I get on it..I do an updated one

>>6496
Make me a full body picture of this girl, from front, without hiding hands, arms, legs and feets. And without any hueg trenchcoat or some shit, obscuring the majority of her anatomical features. Then I can give you more helpful feedback.

You have some nice style going on. Not mind-blowing, but it's alright. Work on it

"Tar of the Day"

An attempt to step away from manga inspired art
>>6498

okay anon I'll get on it...

"My War"

>>6489

Not important, but I thought I'd help clarify. The girl he drew in that pic is most likely Asuka Langley Soryu, from Neon Genesis Evangelion. In the second Rebuild movie, released recently, she had her last name changed from Soryu to Shikinami.

Generic Fanart

concept for Areia Olho from my manga

>>6500
You still haven't gotten on shit, hence no comments. The rest is like the rest, nothing new to say.

Watercolor and pencil again. Took about 10 hours. Forgive me for the crappy photo quality.

Any comments are welcome.

I think your colouring looks good. I like the texture of her skirt in this one >>6606, although I feel that the whites of her eyes are missing and her legs look a little odd.
I like the detailed creases on the shirt.

>>6607 Yeah, there are no whites in the eyes. I still haven't decided if I want to change that or not. Usually I draw in b&w, so I don't have to worry about that. But, if it's distracting, it may be better to put whites in her eyes.

And yes, her legs do look a bit off. There are several things working against them, but primarily is that I had a lot of trouble showing depth with her legs. Perhaps if you could see her feet it would make more sense. Hrm. It's hard to show depth with a skirt like that. Any suggestions?

>>6608

I think the biggest problem is that proportions get fudged up as you move down along her body. The hip is where it is most noticeable... her left hip is much more inflated than her right, even if you're trying to go for the angle.

About showing depth, showing us your construction lines would be good, if possible. If you don't know what I'm talking about, the attached picture illustrates construction lines. Use them.

Other notes...
Aside from the construction lines, I think the problem with the skirt is that the hem of the skirt is perfectly horizontal, while the rest of the body has a slight slant downward (eyes, arms, leg, etc). Also, you might want to put some shadows on the far side of her left knee to show depth. Eyes are pretty well drawn, the angle might be a little steep though. It would really help if you added a nose.

Oh, and the canvas/easel is totally off...its perfectly horizontal and 2-D! Little things like that can really mess up the overall perspective of a picture. Otherwise, pretty good job, keep at it and post some more when you can!

>>6574 Ack, her neck is broken!

Yoshimitsu on the lam...

Likin the style. OC1?

>>6525
what kind of tank is that?

>>6528
Do I see some fackin denis?

>>6530
Yes.

beefy

spoink

>>6540
I like your shading technique.

You made those with MS Paint, right?

yes.

>>6525

This looks incredibly familiar.

>>6562
Yeah, I posted that same tank drawing around late 2005, during the time when this site was still called "foolchan" or "humblefool.net" or whatever.
I think I received one reply which read something like "stop".